Check out the original thread here if you want the background...
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic ... o86SEuZ17w
Anyway, here is the latest post I made on the kisslicer forum comparing the same part made with slic3r and kisslicer. Slic3r shows extremely little banding while kisslicer shows significant banding.
I don't think it is an inherent problem with kisslicer since it works so much better than slic3r in every other way and the fact that others don't have this problem. I feel it is probably something wrong with the settings, but am scratching my head at this point. Any ideas?I have tweaked heated bed and hot end PID settings (now hold +/- 0.2-deg on the heated bed at 90C and +/- 1.5-deg on the hotend at 240C)
Here are two of the same parts with the same general settings. Both prints were made back to back with no tweaks to the printer itself. Settings: (can get detailed screenshots or gcode output tonight if needed)
- 0.20mm layers, 0.48mm extrusion width, 3 perimeters, 0.6mm skin, 40% rounded infill, 30 mm/s print speed (24 mm/s for perimeters), 90C bed, 240C hotend
Other than the banding, the kisslicer part is a million times better in pretty much every way possible. If I could just get rid of this (mostly) cosmetic issue, I would be really happy.
Original conversation is here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic ... o86SEuZ17w
Slic3r (left) vs KISSlicer (right)
[img]https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5604/157 ... cc4b_c.jpg[/img]
Slic3r (bottom) vs KISSlicer (top)
[img]https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3952/155 ... e67b_c.jpg[/img]
Thanks.